← Return to PHP Web Museum

/dev/null

a forum for people who would rather be compiling something

You are not logged in.

#1 Yesterday 18:02:11

horic
Moderator
From: Brno
Registered: 2004-11-02
Posts: 9
Website

Ubuntu 5.10 vs Debian stable - thoughts?

Been running Breezy on the laptop for about two months now. apt-get is apt-get, nothing new there, but the installer is a lot less painful than Debian's if you don't want to think about partitioning for twenty minutes. Suspend to RAM even works on the ThinkPad, which sarge never managed.

Still not sure I'd put it on a server over sarge though. Anyone running Ubuntu on boxes that have to stay up?


Debian sarge / 2.6.12 / fluxbox

Online

 

#2 Yesterday 18:41:52

retupmoc
New member
From: Portland, OR
Registered: 2004-06-19
Posts: 9

Re: Ubuntu 5.10 vs Debian stable - thoughts?

horic wrote:

Still not sure I'd put it on a server over sarge though.

Agreed. Sarge's release cycle is glacial but that's sort of the point for anything touching production. A six-month cadence is nice for a desktop, less nice when you're the one doing the dist-upgrade at 2am.


(setq inhibit-startup-message t)

Offline

 

#3 Yesterday 19:20:07

tnorr
New member
From: Uppsala, Sweden
Registered: 2004-08-11
Posts: 8
Website

Re: Ubuntu 5.10 vs Debian stable - thoughts?

Ubuntu only promises 18 months of security updates for 5.10. Sarge gets them until a year after etch is out, and etch isn't even frozen yet. For servers that settles it for me.

Offline

 

#4 Yesterday 20:15:40

s_h
New member
From: Toronto
Registered: 2005-02-27
Posts: 6

Re: Ubuntu 5.10 vs Debian stable - thoughts?

I went from XP straight to Ubuntu last month and skipped Debian entirely out of impatience. So far the only thing that's given me trouble is a winmodem, which is apparently on nobody's priority list.


registered linux user #398112

Offline

 

#5 Today 07:14:26

dref
New member
From: Vancouver, BC
Registered: 2005-09-30
Posts: 6

Re: Ubuntu 5.10 vs Debian stable - thoughts?

Winmodems are a lost cause, get a cheap PCI hardware modem off eBay if you still need dialup for anything. Sounds like you got off easy compared to my Breezy install, which didn't see the second monitor until I edited xorg.conf by hand:

Code:

Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier  "Default Layout"
    Screen   0  "Screen0" 0 0
    Screen   1  "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0"
    InputDevice "Generic Keyboard"
    InputDevice "Configured Mouse"
EndSection

Section "ServerFlags"
    Option "Xinerama" "true"
EndSection

Fine since then.

Offline

 

#6 Today 07:58:03

segv
New member
Registered: 2005-01-18
Posts: 7

Re: Ubuntu 5.10 vs Debian stable - thoughts?

Dapper is supposed to be the long-term support release, 3 years on the desktop and 5 on servers. If that actually happens it changes the argument a bit. Due in April, so probably June.


Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Online

 

#7 Today 08:52:45

mkay
Administrator
From: Leeds, UK
Registered: 2004-03-14
Posts: 6

Re: Ubuntu 5.10 vs Debian stable - thoughts?

For what it's worth I keep Debian stable on anything that needs to stay up and Ubuntu on anything I'm actively poking at. Not a very exciting answer but it's held up for a year now.

Offline

 

#8 Today 09:41:18

horic
Moderator
From: Brno
Registered: 2004-11-02
Posts: 9
Website

Re: Ubuntu 5.10 vs Debian stable - thoughts?

Fair enough. Laptop stays on Breezy, the file server stays on sarge, and I'll look again when Dapper is out.


Debian sarge / 2.6.12 / fluxbox

Online

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson